# Implementation

## FFT-Accelerated PEEC Method

There are two main categories of field simulation methods:

Differential equation based method (FEM, FD, etc.)

Integral equation based method (MoM, FVM, PEEC, etc.)

The PEEC method is an integral equation method. The fundamental idea is to represent the field simulation problem with a very large distributed equivalent circuit consisting of resistances, self-inductances, mutual inductances, and capacitances.

This PEEC method features several advantanges:

Only the active materials are discretized (no need to mesh the free-space).

Intuitive understanding of the equation discretization process.

Straightforward connection of external circuit elements.

The fundamental drawback of the PEEC method is that the matrix describing the equation system is not sparse. This means that the computational cost and the memory requirements are becoming problematic for large systems.

This problem can be mitigated if the geometry is represented with a voxel structure. In this case, the dense matrices are block-Toeplitz Toeplitz-block matrices. Such matrices can be embedded into circulant tensors reducing the memory requirements from O(n^2) to O(n). Additionally, the matrix-vector multiplications can be done with Fourier transforms. With an FFT algorithm, the computational complexity of matrix-vector multiplications is reduced from O(n^2) to O(n*log(n)). Besides the reduced computational cost and memory requirement, the FFTs allows for the usage of heavily optimized libraries leveraging the parallel processing capabilities of CPUs or GPUs.

PyPEEC is using voxels to describe the geometry and, therefore, can take advantage of the FFT acceleration. This implies that PEEC problems with several millions of voxels can be solved in a few minutes on a laptop computer.

Here are some interesting papers about the PEEC method:

Ruehli IEEE TMTT, 10.1109/TMTT.1974.1128204, 1974

Torchio, IEEE TAP, 10.1109/TAP.2019.2927789, 2019

Torchio, IEEE TPEL, 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3092431, 2022

## Numerical Optimization

The code is reasonably optimized, leveraging NumPy and SciPy for the heavy operations. All the code is vectorized, no loops are used for the array operations. Sparse matrix algebra is used wherever appropriate to speed up the code and limit the memory consumption. Wherever possible, multithreading/multiprocessing is used for exploiting multicore CPUs.

The following optimizations are available for the computationally heavy operations:

Computation of the Green functions and electric-magnetic coupling functions.

If the distance between the considered voxels is small, an analytical solution is used.

If the distance between the considered voxels is large, a numerical approximation is used.

The factorization of the preconditioner sparse matrix can be done with several algorithms.

SuperLU is typically slower but is always available (integrated with SciPy).

UMFPACK is typically faster than SuperLU (available through SciKits).

MKL/PARDISO is typically faster than UMFPACK (available through Pydiso).

PyAMG is typically slow but uses less memory (risk of convergence issues).

Two different iterative solvers are available for the dense matrices.

GMRES - Generalized Minimal RESidual algorithm

GCROT - Flexible GCROT(m,k) algorithm

The FFTs for computing matrix-vector product can be done with several algorithms.

SciPy FFT library is always available (integrated with SciPy)

FFTW has to be installed separately (available through pyFFTW)

CuPy is extremely fast but require GPUs compatible with the CUDA toolkit